Sunday, May 1, 2016

Outlander Season Two, Episode Four: Let's Talk About THAT Scene



Well this week was certainly quite an interesting one, and much like last week, it was quite snappy and quick, blazing through everything in what seemed to be a very short hour long episode. It was a good episode but it's also drummed up some controversy in the Outlander fandom which has led to quite a bit of polarizing. The great thing about television and books is the ability to share your opinion on them, and hopefully my opinion does not cause outrage because the last thing I want to do is piss people off. So let's just dive right in.

The most controversial part of this entire episode was actually a scene taken from the book. That scene, was of course, the rape of young Mary Hawkins. Now I did read a few different review takes on that particular scene and in the comment section, it got nasty. Now I'm all about being able to have your opinion and if I disagree with an opinion, I don't berate and belittle the person who spoke though I might scratch my head and wonder how the heck they came to that conclusion. Much like I scratched my head at the woman who wrote to Diana Gabaldon that after the "hiding under a blade of grass" bit of dialogue, she took it to mean he was gay.

I've seen plenty of drama on the particular review calling out the rape that happened though I don't quite agree with the reviewer's reasoning especially when she called Outlander a "fun" and "light hearted show." That being said I too have issue with the amount of rape in those books. Look I get it alright. Back then rape was one of the most common weapons used against a woman in order to subdue her, to hold power over her and to punish her. It happened and it happened a lot. So within historical context, Diana I suppose isn't wrong to include it within the story line BUT I do feel sometimes that rape is a convenient plot device to move a story along.

I wrote a blog post a while back comparing Outlander to Game of Thrones and how the two shows differed in their handling of rape and I do stand by comments made back then. Game of Thrones definitely has more gratuitous rape scenes that aren't even plot devices and I've always considered rape to be one of the laziest ways to get a plot going. So yeah, Mary Hawkins rape was a cheap lazy way of making her unable to marry her fiance and set up her eventually marrying Black Jack Randall.

All that said, the show is not to blame for the lazy plot devices and for everyone railing against the inclusion of this rape scene there are equally as many saying that it was necessary and that without it the plot couldn't have gone on the way it did.

I see both sides of the situation, and I do love the Outlander books. You really couldn't find someone more passionate about these books and this show, but that's not to say the books aren't flawed. A guy friend of mine that watches the show said that Diana uses rape in the same way that George RR Martin uses death. It's to shock the reader until the shock just wears off and you're just left numb every time someone else suffers assault. Is Diana being historically accurate? More than likely yes, and I know that she has received plenty of letters and emails thanking her for showing rape for the horrible horrible crime it is against men and women.

Contrary to that single reviewer, the show and books are not light hearted in fun. Sure there are moments of humor in order to keep the show balanced but ultimately the story of Outlander is one of deep romance, drama and history that turns into a story of family love and survival throughout it's course. I expect for a period drama, there to be plenty of horrible things and while we could have arrived at the same conclusion concerning Mary without her being raped, it doesn't change the fact that it does happen in the books as well. Whether you agree with that plot device or not, is based on your personal opinion and I won't fault you for drawing your own conclusions but I do hope that other assaults in the book are left out though I know of at least two, should the show last that long, that will definitely be included.

Perhaps Diana writes out these scenes in order to show how different people handle the trauma. We've seen it with Jamie, and Claire has certainly been nearly raped in the show on more than one occasion and we have seen how Jamie's dealt with the PTSD thanks to that horrible disgusting thing that Black Jack did to him. Could it have been handled differently? Yes. Definitely, but my two cents would be that if you did not like it, do not blame the show for what it derives from the source material. Disagreements are certainly going to happen. Millions of people have read the books and watched the show and have formed their opinions about certain things. Not everyone is going to agree about certain aspects of the show and their opinions should not be invalidated, but you should be able to give a differing opinion without resulting to name calling and mud slinging. The author of the aforementioned review was certainly allowed to voice her opinion and while I do disagree with some of her points and scratched my head a bit, she's entitled to that opinion without having to be attacked for it even if that opinion is unpopular. You can respectfully disagree with someone without being nasty and tawdry. One review is just that. A review. It's meant to be agreed with or disagreed with and I know plenty who were on either side of the argument.

So what did YOU think of that scene? Please comment below, and don't be afraid to voice an opinion that might be unpopular. I'd hope there would be no attacks beneath. If you disagree with me, feel free to tell me why. I love hearing differing opinions because if everyone agreed completely with everyone, the world would be a very boring place.

Until next time, Sassenachs!

- G

Monday, April 25, 2016

Outlander Season Two, Episode Three: Not So Useless After All


First off, I want to apologize for the delay as I've been quite busy with real life and so it's been a bit hard to bang out a recap and review worthy of a read. So here we are on episode three out of thirteen and even though so much has happened in the past three episodes, there is still so much more to go. Crazy right? So let's get down to business and discuss those useful occupations.

There were certainly several key point that the show highlighted and focused on. Jamie has been run ragged working to undermine the Jacobite cause of Charles Stuart and Claire has been bored as hell doing nothing but attending teas and card games with Louise and Mary. Claire is a woman who's life has come to a stand still. She's not exactly the stay at home and mend a shirt type and her idea of a good time is actually doing something with her time that doesn't involve tittering behind a fan. She's envious of Jamie's coming and going and bored to tears and honestly I don't blame her for that. Sure it's a rich person's problem but Claire's never lived a life where she wasn't needed. She worked with her Uncle Lamb as a kid, a nurse as an adult and when she fell through time, she was a healer for the MacKenzie crew so she's never really been without something to do and it works her nerves.


Jamie on the other hand, is being run to his limit, playing politics, trying to garner information and like Claire, has the knowledge that a Jacobite uprising will end in the decimation of his culture and homeland. It's a huge weight to carry and it takes a toll on their relationship and at a key point in the episode it seems all for naught. Charles pressures Jamie into a meeting with Duvernay and it is at that meeting with Duvernay that we find out that Charles does not need as much money as Jamie nor Claire originally thought. It is revealed that high ranking members of English society are financially backing Charles and that means the amount of money needed isn't all that much. Charles also manages to turn Duvernay's head with he possibility of an alliance with England. It's to good a deal to pass up and Duvernay at least agrees to consider it and present it to King Louis once the proof is provided hat he does indeed, not need all that much from the treasury.


At the same time hat Jamie's hopes of stopping financial backers is being crushed, Claire has found a renewed purpose in life as Master Raymond has suggested to her that she could volunteer at a charity hospital. She takes that into advice and finds a renewed sense of purpose by working at the hospital. It's there we meet a very important character by name of Mother Hildegarde. A stern older woman who at first thinks that Claire is nothing more that a rich woman wanting to get a few props for doing a little charity work without much of the actual work involved. After Claire proves her knowledge of medicine and sickness, you can see that Mother Hildegarde finds some respect for a woman whom she had only assumed to be a rich lady without substance.


So after spending an entire day tending to the sick, she comes home to a waiting and impatient Jamie who is angry that she would dare subject herself to the sickly while pregnant. Their argument was certainly one that needed to happen and both of them were right to their anger. Jamie's anger stems from doing nothing but lying constantly. Claire's anger stems from Jamie's anger at her which ultimately I think is just jealousy on both of their ends. She's jealous that he's working to end the cause while he's jealous that she gets to do something that she enjoys. Obviously a more open line of communication between them would help them out.


After their fight, Jamie leaves in a huff and goes back to the brothel, where he notes the actions of a young boy picking the pockets of the brothel customers. An idea forms in his mind and he swiftly chases the boy down until he captures him and after some humorous back and forth, he essentially blackmails the boy, Fergus, into working for him and stealing letters.

The funniest part of the entire episode was when Claire discovers Fergus in the house eating some chicken and his response to her presence was to essentially tell her "nice boobs." Of course Murtagh interjects and states that he said the same thing to Suzette, the ladie's maid and Claire's response is quite funny. "Well that doesn't make me feel very special." It was honestly to me, the funniest part of the scene and Fergus is quite the little scamp and charmer. I just adore him.


So once Fergus is employed with Jamie, they begin intercepting letters and come across a musical code. A code that can only be cracked by someone with a knowledge of the German language and of Music. So it turns out that Claire's volunteer work actually comes in handy because Mother Hildegarde ends up helping to crack the musical code. So see, not so useless after all.


Once the code is cracked, Jamie and Murtagh and Claire are all celebrating but there is a dark stain on that celebration because it involves working with the Duke of Sandgringham and if Jamie sits down with the Duke, then Jamie will most definitely learn about the survival of Black Jack Randall.

It's also worth noting that earlier in the episode, there was a HUGE revelation about Black Jack Randall and Mary Hawkins. Turns out that Mary is he ancestor of Frank Randall and so that's certainly thrown a huge wrench into the cogs of the story. So how does Mary become the future great great grandmother of Frank Randall? Well, we'll just have to find out and see won't we?


I think the major head scratcher for this episode, if I were to really have a complaint, would be how openly Claire, Jamie and Murtagh talk subterfuge of the Jacobite cause in front of Jared's servants. True, Jared's servants are loyal, but they also know that Jared is a very firm Jacobite. Wouldn't such open conversation make it easy for the servants to relate the undermining to their employer? Not to say that this might be utilized by the show later. I don't think it will, it's just something funky I noticed.

So what did you think of Fergus? What did you think of Mother Hildegarde? And most importantly what are you looking forward to in next week's episode or at least hoping to happen? Sound off in the comments below.

Be sure to check out our links and our podcast that is now available on iTunes. 


Podcast: http://outlandersassenachfanpodcast.podomatic.com/entry/2016-04-25T06_42_31-07_00
Facebook Page: http://www.facebook.com/outlandersassenachpage
Tumblr: http://outlandersassenach.tumblr.com


And you have until April 28th to purchase our t-shirt! 






They are twenty dollars a piece plus shipping and handling. All proceeds go toward funding storage space for our podcast. Your patronage would be greatly appreciated:

Link to the tee shirts:  https://teespring.com/sassenach-stones-tee

Until next week Sassenachs!

Sunday, April 17, 2016

Outlander Season 2 Episode 2: It's All About Murtagh and I Love It!



So Sassenachs, here we are, already on the second episode and can I say what an absolutely jam packed episode this was. Introductions to so many new characters in flesh form, instead of just our imaginations, so many funny and tender moments and a few changes from book to screen that some people are okay with and others are probably ripping their hair out over. Overall I found the episode to be quite fantastic but I think the real star of S2E2 was Murtagh Fitzgibbons, the ultimate Wingman played by the ever so charming Duncan Lacroix. 

Now don't get me wrong. There are some great scenes outside of scenes with Murtagh but he seems to be the central figure in nearly every important scene there is, except for the introductions of Master Raymond and little Marry Hawkins. His complete aversion to French society is apparent throughout and honestly he and Jamie play so well off each other, almost like a bantering father and son.

We get our first glimpse of Murtagh with Jamie enjoying a bit of sword practice and Murtagh enjoying a great bit of teasing at Jamie's expense, pushing him to do better but it's obvious that Jamie's hand is still in quite a bit of mending.



The exchange between Jamie, Bonnie Prince Charles and Murtagh in the brothel is certainly tense. Charles is only after the throne, and wanting to use the Scottish people to accomplish the deed, claiming that it is by God's will that his father and he be placed on the English Throne. After all, they are Stuarts and not Hanovers!Those German Georges have no right to the throne! Murtagh of course, eloquently states that most of Scotland is home to simple folk, people who work and toil the land and fight each other often. What would make a simple farmer trade in his scythe for a sword? Of course Charles' answer is more preening about he is God's chosen to be on the English throne and it's quite quickly established that there will be no convincing the good Prince that to create an uprising would be disastrous. The only good news, is that Charles at least trusts Jamie enough to get him to play as a representative of Scotland and the Jacobite cause at the French Court of Louis XV and to make friends with the Minister of Finance. Charles after all, needs money in order to support a Jacobite rebellion against the English.

Murtagh is contemplating murder of a Prince here I'm sure.


Murtagh of course, is there when the information is relayed to Claire and they all seem to agree that convincing Duvernay that Charles is a bad investment is the best way to go about stopping the Jacobite Rising and as they are hopeful, we viewers have already been cursed with the future knowledge that their plans will fail. I suppose the producers and writers of the show wanted us to feel that same dread that Claire feels in knowing what the future holds, except we can't stop it like she's trying to do.

What? No line about "verra large sausage"? Inconceivable!

French court is of course nothing like Scotland. Full of vapid and shallow well dressed french men and women, and Murtagh certainly sticks out like a sore thumb. I have to admire how the writers really have created him as a great side kick to Jamie and to Claire. He's more brash, more blunt than either of them and isn't afraid to say what's on his mind. His reaction to both Claire's dress and the dress of the King's Mistress certainly made me giggle and that's nothing compared to the outright laughter I felt watching him play out the scene with Jamie while they were both in audience of the King taking a shit. And yeah, within a historical context, those things actually happened. A King of France had no privacy at all and was constantly surrounded by servants and high ranking members of French Aristocracy. I don't know about you, but I'm certainly glad I was never a French royal forced to be audience to a whole bunch of people while I used the bathroom.

We seriously came all the way here to watch a man shit?


Perhaps the most pivotal scene in the entire episode, is the one you least expect. It's when Murtagh spots the Duke of Sandgringham and nearly draws his weapon on the sorry bastard. Murtagh is going to cut his balls off but is stayed by Jamie who doesn't want to see his godfather executed for not following the rules of French society. Murtagh shows his disgust as Jamie and Claire seemingly forgive the Duke for the part he played in Jamie's imprisonment and subsequent torture and I'm sure we all felt like Murtagh.

That moment when we are all Murtagh.


The only revelation that isn't really made with Murtagh present is when Claire and the Duke are left alone and it is revealed that Black Jack Randall is not dead, and honestly, I wanted to run a sword through the Duke myself as he reveled in the fact that he'd caused Claire distress. That Jamie's horrible tormentor is alive and well is an icy chill down her spine. She and Jamie had been working toward intimacy and now she's debating on whether or not to tell him that the bastard that had raped and tortured him was still alive.

Seriously. Fuck this guy.


It certainly left the episode in a tense moment and that tenseness will just have to be kept until next Saturday when we see if Claire reveals the truth to Jamie or he finds out of his own volition. A distraction like this, would certainly put a damper on their plans to stop the Rebellion after all. Jamie would be hellbent on destroying Black Jack Randall in any way that he could.



Overall, I think the episodes funny moments wouldn't be quite so funny if we didn't have Murtagh in the background pulling faces. Be it the dress Claire wore, Jamie running into an old infatuation, or the Mistress to the King's swan dress, it's obvious that his face was what every one of us was thinking. It was a great episode, full to the brim with twists and turns and I am ever so impatient to watch the new installment of it come Saturday next.

The look of a man about to have a stroke. 

If he stares any harder, his eyes are gonna pop out of his skull.


I do think that my one disappointment was that the honey pot scene was not quite as humorous as it was in the book, and while I'm a little sad about it, I still found the changes very much in line with how the show is working things out. Book to screen adaptions, after all, cannot be perfectly rendered and changes have to be made to suit the medium the book is adapting too. We can just be thankful that books like these are given a tv series instead of a two to three hour long movie. Imagine how much would get cut out then!

So what did you think of this episode Sassenachs? Were you happy with the changes? Angry? Feel free to reply in the comments below!

Saturday, April 9, 2016

Outlander Season 2, Episode 1: The Night Outlander Fans Lost Their Minds

Now Featuring a Podcast! Listen Here: 





Picture it. April 9th, 2016. A hungry crowd of American women and men sit in front of their TVs, heart pounding and biting their nails in anticipation. This was it. The moment that eleven months of Droughtlander finally ended with the words "Previously on Outlander." There was a collective scream of excitement in households all along the East Coast and beyond and people on the edge of their seat as the first scene opened to Caitriona Balfe's Claire, laying on grass.



I don't know about you guys, but I feel like we're in for some depressing shit.
"I wished I were dead." Melancholy sets the tone for the first half of this episode. Gray tones in the cinematography create the environment that feeds into the depression that Claire is obviously feeling, as evident by the first words she utters and the horrifying scream as she gazes at the stones. We of course, soon realize that she has been brought back to her own time and the year is now 1948 and her plans of stopping the complete evisceration of the Jacobite Army at Culloden Moor has failed.

After the slightly altered opening credits and Skye Boat Song (partly sang in French) commence, we're back to the story and Frank purposefully steps into our lives again after a long eight episode absence. He's the concerned husband, a man shocked to discover his wife has been found after disappearing near on three years ago and you can see the nerves as he slowly enters into the hospital room where his wife lay, staring out the window.


 I wish I had a funny and clever caption for this scene, but it's just too depressing.

Now this entire first half of the episode was not written like this in the book but I think what Ron Moore and the writers did with the material was fantastic, and I'm going to go out and just say that TV Frank is far superior to Book Frank. In the book, Frank flips out when Claire tells him her story, and literally loses his shit. Now, for a lot of people, this turns them off of Frank in the books and makes him out to be some sort of super dick for it, even though he's completely within his rights to flip his shit. I've written an entire article on the issues I have with the Frank Hate in this link here, if you want to read more detail about that. TV Frank, on the other hand, is very humanized. He's seen throughout his time on screen as understanding, hopeful, angry, relieved, nervous, and desperate.


 Seriously, TV Frank is way better than Book Frank.
TV Frank's acceptance of her story, mirrors Jamie's acceptance of her time travel way back in The Devil's Mark of Season One. He tells her he believes her, and he's on board with everything until Claire tells him she's pregnant. At first, he's ecstatic, but then she reinforces that the child is not biologically his and we see him lose his sense of understanding for a split moment. It's a tense moment and you can see the anger he feels, his fist clenching up at the fury and then he just stumbles out of the room and the house of the reverend to a shed and tears it to shit. I found his behavior, not at all to much, or to out of place considering the situation, and I think aside from the fact that Claire was carrying a man's child, his own manly pride was hurt in that he could never give her a child, but this stranger had. It was something, I believe, that reinforced his lack of self worth because as a man of that time, not being able to have children was something worthy of shame. He, perhaps, did not feel like a whole man because he was unable to create a child.



After he cools down and talks it over with the Reverend, it seems that a cool head prevails and he and Claire have a bit of a chat. Start from scratch, renew their life together. I found it rather touching that he was so willing to be there for her and for the child in her belly. That he was going to stand by her when he had every reason to leave her to raise a child on her own and face the stigma of being known as that "crazy runaway wife with the bastard child." It showed that Frank was indeed an honorable man, who was so willing to start over with his wife and begin again. He's a good guy, a little flawed for sure, but ultimately, a good man to Claire.

So, Frank and Claire are onto new beginnings, but what happened that led her back to the stones? A question that is starting to be answered when the scene transitions back to the past and to France.

The depression and melancholic look of the film is replaced with a bright and bustling port and with Claire and Jamie and Murtagh. I don't know about you guys, but finally seeing Claire and Jamie together made me literally scream out loud in happiness. FINALLY! As great as Frank was in the first half hour, I was so ready to see Jamie's sexy ass again and there he was, dressed well enough, still pained, his hand bound and dealing with a good bit of sea sickness. At least he's finally got his sense of humor back eh? At least of a fashion.


 Murtagh's look of disgust as he talks about Frogs really mimics my own face when I get told to stop obsessing about Outlander.

Obviously, Jamie is still recovering from his terrible ordeal with Black Jack Randall and there's almost a motherly feel to the scene when she tells him "I'm here." Her voice is soothing and soft, reaffirming that she isn't going to let him go so easily.

They set their goal to try and stop the Jacobite uprising so as to prevent Culloden. Of course, it has already been revealed that the terrible Battle of Culloden Moor will happen, so it makes the optimism of Claire and Jamie a little harder to swallow and we as the audience, cheer them on, even though we know their endeavors will end in failure. Meeting Jared Fraser was certainly interesting and it's a shame we shan't see to much more of him. I like the passionate guy, that's for sure. Jared promises to get Jamie in on the Jacobite cause and to meet with the leaders of said cause, while also giving up the reins of his winery as he goes off on another business venture. It is after this meeting, that there is a panic on board a newly docked ship and as Claire is not the type to hold fast and leave things be, she jumps right in and lo and behold, the ship is infested with Smallpox.


"Seriously Sassenach, can you stop being selfless for once?There's no room in the past for you to be a decent person."

Smallpox being one of the most dangerous diseases in the world before vaccines were invented, causes everyone to panic and it is then that we meet Stanley Webber's Comte St. Germain. Now, I've seen Stanley Webber act before as Juan Borgia in Netflix's Borgia but seeing him in that powdered wig did make me giggle a little (not even gonna lie). Even so, the man cut's an intimidating figure and thanks to Claire's selfless act, he now has to deal with the fact that he's losing an entire shipment of cargo that he would have willingly put to the masses, knowing about the possible spread of small pox. Greedy selfish bastard.


 Is it bad that I think he's kinda hot?

Of course, losing all of that cargo certainly would put quite a hole in his finances so it's really not all that surprising that he would try to save himself money despite the horrendous outcome of spreading possibly small pox tainted cargo. Jamie notes that it sure doesn't take Claire long to make enemies but he still loves her anyway and they have a big ole smooch right there as St. Germain's ship lights up the night sky.


I'm sure the Comte will forgive them for making him lose a fortune. He seemed rational to me.

Now I did find the pacing of this episode a little off and while the Frank and Claire moments were engaging, words can't describe how happy I was to finally see Claire and Jamie together again after months upon months of waiting to see them back in action. I do think it's obvious that Season 2 will blaze through the source material a little faster than the original season of Outlander did with it's book. I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing, though with the liberties taken to Frank's story line might make some people upset. I'm not going to be upset because I really found Frank's character far more endearing here than I ever did in the book. I happen to like that such liberties were taken with the story line but that's of course, my own personal opinion.

Overall, the first episode was really great, and while the original premier of Outlander seemed slow to start, this one was full of raw emotion from the very beginning, gripping us by the heart strings and holding us tight through all of it. It set's the scene perfectly and makes sure to immerse us once more in a story we all love.


Though I love Wee Roger most.

So what were your thoughts on the premier? Did you enjoy it? Anything negative to say about it? I'd love to hear from you so be sure to leave a comment below or leave one on our Facebook page or on Tumblr.

Also OutlanderSassenach will be uploading PODCASTS every Monday following new episodes so stay tuned for that!

http://www.facebook.com/outlandersassenachpage
http://outlandersassenach.tumblr.com

Until next week, Sassenachs!

Now Featuring a Podcast! Listen HERE!
 http://outlandersassenachfanpodcast.podomatic.com/entry/2016-04-10T14_48_21-07_00

Friday, February 5, 2016

The Top Ten Sexiest Men in Period Drama

Previously on this blog, we discussed what makes period dramas so awesome and with a few top ten lists already under my belt with The Top Ten Claire Moments and Top Ten Jamie Moments of Outlander Season One, I decided to throw my hat in and do something a little differently. Why not a top ten list of men I think are sexy in a Period Drama. Now this is just in period drama roles, and not overall and it's a perfectly debatable top ten list since beauty is of course, in the eye of the beholder. This list will include men featured in miniseries, television shows and feature films. Don't agree with this list? Want to add to it? Feel free to comment with your own personal favorite or someone I didn't mention. That being said, onto the list!

#10 - Jonathan Crombie, Anne of Green Gables


My first book boyfriend come to life, Jonathan Crombie played the infuriating, and ultimately wonderful Gilbert Blythe. Starring as Blythe in the entire Anne of Green Gables franchise,  he had boyish charm, a competitive spirt and ultimately a well felt love for Megan Follows' Anne with an "e". Watching him progress from boy to man over the course of the three different miniseries was perhaps the start of my love affair with men in period drama.

#9 - Clark Gable, Gone With the Wind


No one else on this earth could play Rhett Butler so well. Timothy Dalton tried to do so in the made for tv miniseries Scarlett (based on the sequel of the same name that was written by Alexandra Ripley) but there is no one that could play the dashing scoundrel with such ease as Clark could. His sarcasm, wit, and charm were well delivered thanks to Clark's impressive timing and though he actually hated the role, you couldn't tell when he played opposite Vivien Leigh's Scarlett O'Hara.

#8 - Heath Ledger, Casanova


Heath Ledger is no stranger to period drams. He was in quite a few before his untimely death at the age of 28 but my favorite role for him, has to be Casanova. Charming, debonair, fly by the seat of his pants type. He was charming, sexy, and arrogant, and yet it was far to easy to love him. He and Sienna Miller had true chemistry in this film and it will forever be a treasured favorite to see him avoiding inquisitors and realizing what true love is after all.

#7 - Ewan McGregor, Moulin Rouge


Another star crossed lover's story is Moulin Rouge. We have a down on his luck writer with a gift for song and a love for a dancer/courtesan. While Baz Luhrman's Moulin Rouge is flashy and full of pizazzz, Ewan doesn't need any of that to stand out above the rest. He's a hopeless romantic, handsome, full of love and light and optimism despite all obstacles. His voice is heart melting alone but when he looks at you, you feel like the only woman in the world.

#6 - Tom Hardy, Wuthering Heights


Dark and depraved Heathcliff is played excellently by Tom Hardy. He manages to be as charming and handsome as he is frightening. He manages to be so cold, and yet there is nothing one wants more than to be Cathy and let him kiss you as passionately as he can. Yes, Heathcliff was truly a terrible anti-hero when one considers his actions but there is no denying that Tom Hardy makes you want the bad boy even more.

#5 - Sean Bean, Lady Chatterley


Aside from being known as "that guy that dies in every movie" Sean Bean is an exceptional actor and has appeared in quite a few period pieces like The Black Death, Scarlett and my personal favorite, Lady Chatterley, where he plays the married groundskeeper to the Chatterley estate, and consequently, Lady Chatterley's lover. Witty, sarcastic and passionate, he lights up the screen and makes more than few smiles that might very well knock your socks off.

#4 - Richard Armitage, North and South


Often, the characteristics of a great period drama include broody men who are tall and dark haired. Mr. Thornton, played by Richard Armitage, is one such character. His presence is powerful and despite the air of command he exudes, there is gentleness as well as an honesty in his manner in disposition. You get the keen feeling he will protect you and hold you close, but not be afraid to speak his mind. And honestly that kiss at the train station was a cherry on top of a perfect miniseries romance.

#3 -  Henry Cavill, The Tudors


Playing opposite Jonathan Rhys Meyers as his best friend and the Duke of Suffolk, Henry Cavill brings a bit of elegance, charm and ruthlessness to the role of King Henry VIII's best friend. More than a little debauched, it was totally worth all of the screen time when he was busy walking around naked and showing his taut buttocks. Most people who don't enjoy period dramas probably only see him as Superman but to those of us that have been fans of period dramas since the dawn of time, you will have noticed him in a few roles aside from this one, but for me, this role was my absolute favorite.

#2 - Sam Heughan, Outlander


I'm an Outlander blog so OF COURSE Sam is going to make this list, but he is not my number one. Shocking right? Well he is my number two. Red hair, tall, built, he personifies Jamie Fraser in a way no one else could and man can he act! Sexy, and easily playing a man both generous, innocent and at the same time rather worldly, Sam Heughan pulls it off effortless. And let's be honest, who doesn't enjoy a man in a kilt?

HONORABLE MENTIONS

So this is a top ten list, as such plenty of sexy men did not make the cut. Leonardo DiCaprio for Titanic, Dominic Cooper from The Duchess, Cillian Murphy from Peaky Blinders, Tom Hiddleston from Crimson Peak, Jonathan Rhys Meyers from The Tudors and Francois Arnoud from The Borgias were narrowly edged out. You don't know how hard a time I had deciding between all these men who are each sexy in their own, unique ways.

So, without further adieu, let me introduce my number one pic for sexiest man in a period drama

#1 - Colin Firth, Pride and Prejudice


Colin Firth, is the ONLY Darcy. Let's be real here. Sure, Matthew MacFayden did a good job in the 2005 version of Pride and Prejudice opposite Keira Knightly but ultimately, the crown will forever be held by Colin. He is perfectly Mr. Darcy. Of course, this was not his only period drama either but it is perhaps one of his most iconic roles. He is sophisticated, tall, brooding, dark haired, handsome, and even be taken down a few notches by Elizabeth Bennett. He is Darcy, he is sexy and I have just three words for you to epitomize my reasons for making him number one. The pond scene.

So, do you not agree? If not, who do you think should be number one. Feel free to tell me who I missed, and who I got wrong.

Until next time Sassenachs.

Sunday, January 24, 2016

What Makes a Period Drama Awesome?

What made you interested in Outlander? The romance? The adventure? The Time travel? The characters? Maybe it was the historical setting and the intrigue of the time frame in which Outlander and all of it's sequels take place? I have ALWAYS been a fan of history and romance and combining the two together. I grew up on Disney Princess movies and got my start on period dramas watching the CBC and Disney production of Anne of Green Gables with Megan Follows. Gilbert Blythe was my first literary boyfriend and it kickstarted my love of romantic period piece dramas and television shows. So what makes a Period drama so wonderful anyway?

#1: The Costumes


Whether it's the beautiful dresses of The Tudors, the corsets of Victorian Dramas like Little Dorrit or Nicholas Nickelby, the costumes tell  a story as much as the movie or show itself. The costumes are a character and that's what makes them so important. The puffy sleeved white shirts, the cravats, the surcoats, the jewels, the hair, the simplicity or the ornate. Each costume is a part of making my heart aflutter.

#2: The Settings



What suits your fancy more? The gray and green Scottish highlands of Outlander, or the cheery hamlets of Prince Edward Island? Perhaps you prefer the hustle and bustle of London or the beautiful courts of Versailles there is always something to be admired. Much like the costumes, the settings are just as wonderful to gaze upon and soak up. They are a character too. If the settings don't seem authentic, then the entire production feels like a waste. With such settings, mixed with the costumes, you could also be transported to that place and time and if the production mucks up the setting then it's no good as a whole.

#3: The Speech

Speech, and dialects are often key to a period drama and make them awesome. The eloquence of Mr. Darcy as he proposes to Elizabeth Bennett, who's witty reply this hurtful comments make you wince with the sting of the burn inflicted. Shakespeare probably has the win here because there is nothing more romantic than seeing two people in period costumes professing love and more fantastic than characters demanding retribution or revenge. It just seems more refined, and the words a bit more flowery. The elegance and propriety of most makes it especially pleasing to the ear.

#4: The Men


Alright ladies, I think it's quite safe to assume that there is something extra special about men in period costumes. For instance, in real life, I don't think Sam Heughan is all that attractive, but when he wears a kilt and he's a little dirty, he's one of the sexiest men on the planet. Otherwise handsome men, look even sexier wearing puffy white shirts with a hint of chest hair showing at the vee of the collar. It's the fact that it hints at more I think, that makes it so sexy. It's probably why for men, back in the day, ankles when seen were so sexy. You wouldn't think they were but seeing just a hint of flesh under a lot of fabric gets the heart afluttering. Modesty really can be super sexy.

#5: The Romance


Probably what put's the cherry on top of the sundae for me is the romance that is seen throughout period dramas (especially those based on books). Growing up I wanted to be Anne to Gilbert, Elizabeth to Darcy. I wanted to parade in an extravagant ballgown and dance the night away with Bingley and be kissed under a tree by a handsome man in a cravat. Period dramas feed into this fantasy and as we grow older, watching a film, we can pretend we are part of the setting. Even as adults, we can act like little princesses again and enjoy a wonderful romance with the rakes and hellions of whatever time period we decide to immerse ourselves in.

#6: The Story Itself

Even with all of the above elements, what is probably most important of all, is the actual story. There are several genres of Period drama, though romance seems to be the most popular. The stories of war, of honor, of chivalry. The stories of beating the odds, of becoming more, of heroes and villains, of heroines and heart. They are relatable stories in one form or another, despite a space of time between them. With all of the elements, nothing completes a period drama better than a good story.  Whether it's overcoming one's own pride and vanity, like Elizabeth Bennett and Anne Shirley had to do, or overcoming selfishness and understanding that your feelings aren't the only one that matter as Scarlett did with Rhett. Perhaps it's the sad truth that even good heroes must die and that guilt or innocence, doesn't necessarily matter if you are in the way of a King as Anne Boleyn found out when her ambition was to great. That even if you are truly not a terrible person, a rule that does not cater to the downtrodden might end in your peril (as it did with Marie Antoinette). The story makes the drama, and makes all of the other elements truly worthwhile.

And to be clear here, it's not just the movies and television shows that are awesome. My favorite book genre is romantic historical fiction which is how I was so able to get into Outlander. I love a Julia Quinn, a Connie Mason and a Catherine Anderson to fill my world and immerse me in a story of love, and passion and corsets. I'm a history lover and history is my greatest passion. Seeing history and romance come together in books or in film, truly make it worth the while.


So what get's you excited about Period Dramas? The passion, the costumes? Feel free to let me know.

Saturday, January 23, 2016

Gearing Up For Season Two!

Hello all, it's been a super long time since I updated this Outlander blog and a lot has happened since my last top ten list. What with the Golden Globes, and the Critic's Choice Awards and the People's Choice Awards and the BAFTAs and all the other awards of the season. I have been super busy getting settled into my new place, role playing (basically writing a story with another person) and trying to keep up on the latest news. Thankfully life has settled down and wouldn't you know it's nearly just in time for the start of Season Two. Last April, if you had told me I would have to wait a whole year for a new season, I would of told you I wouldn't of made it. Droughtlander 2.0 has truly been that. The worst kind of drought imaginable.

There have been quite a few casting reveals but as of this post we are still not aware of who they have cast as Bree though Richard Rankin was announced as Roger Mac way back in the middle of December. Outlander production says they are close so finger's crossed we at least have that. Come on Ron, announce it for Valentine's Day and we'll love you forever (maybe).

So, with Season Two being just roughly over two months away (depending on when they decide to premier since we only have April and not a specific date), I think it was time to discuss a game plan to really get back in the Outlander Spirit. I for one, have quite the plan to which I will share with you lovely people, my dear readers who are honestly the most amazing people there are.

First thing's first, I'm going to start a reread of Dragonfly in Amber. It's only my eighth time, but honestly, I might of missed something. You never know. Amiright?

I was also hoping to revisit the first season of Outlander by watching two episodes a week over the next couple of months, if only to pass the time until the Season Two Premier. Even though the last eight months have been agony, these months leading up to the premier are true and total torture because it's SO CLOSE and yet SO FAR! Ya feel me?

I'm also enjoying discussions in my favorite Facebook groups that center around all that is Outlander and I started coloring in my Outlander Coloring Book but I'm not the best coloring person, as calming as it is. I really fucked up the skin tone of Claire standing with that printed dress on and I'm completely and totally ashamed. I was trying to color blend and used way to much of this pale yellow color to add something besides just peach. It didn't turn out so well.

OH! I forgot to mention that I also started up a facebook page. I know a lot of people don't follow twitter or tumblr and aren't big fans of joining facbeook groups. It's much easier to click like on a page. I get it, which is why for shorter posts that don't warrant a blog, I've now created a facebook page that ties in with everything else that is OutlanderSassenach. I will post the link at the end of the blog post if you care to give it a like. No pressure though!

Anyways, so while I spend the next couple of months re-emersing myself in the world of Outlander, I'm curious. What will you all be doing to gear up for Season Two? Feel free to reply in the comments.

Until next time Sassenachs!

OutlanderSassenach Facebook Page:  https://www.facebook.com/outlandersassenachpage/